Back to the Paleo thing for a minute now. In regards to the author of the cookbook, whose name I didn't bother to check, you are a crazy person. Of course I have no idea if this is the Paleo way, or just the authors view, but it seems a little too out there. I get the idea of going back to caveman roots and I'm sure that much of that food is better for you. But I just couldn't get past the no legumes part of the diet. Listen, I'm not a huge bean lover. I don't eat them on the reg, and I certainly don't go out of my way to add them into my diet. However, if I'm eating at a Mexican (or Mexican inspired) place, and they offer me beans, I say, load 'em up. Nothing goes better with a burrito than a giant spoonful of frijoles negros. It's not so much that the legume family isn't allowed in Paleo, or at least in this Paleo cookbook, it's that the author made it sound like beans were not around in caveman days. As if some regular Joe one day mechanically engineered a plant and it turned into a bean. Surprise! Legumes all around. Alright, let's be honest, I don't know the history of beans, but I am fairly certain that this is a naturally occurring plant. And isn't the whole point of Paleo to eat things that occur naturally in this world? Seems to me that whoever created this diet just really had a vendetta against beans. All I picture is some little kid sitting at his dinner table, going all Pinky and the Brain over taking over the world by eliminating legumes. Clearly someone did this person harm with a bad bean over the course of his/her life, and now it's being taken out on legumes across the world.
Then again, I'm not going Paleo, so it doesn't matter one lick what I think about this diet. You want to give up beans? You go ahead and do it. Enjoy your legume free diet.
By the way; I'm all about those hills, 'bout those hills, no flats.
No comments:
Post a Comment